Why are bull terriers so inbred?

According to one study of the pedigrees of AKC breeds, the bull terrier is the most inbred dog.
Of all the dog breeds currently being “improved,” none is more inbred than the bull terrier. It is also one of the earliest breeds introduced into to the institutionalized dog fancy. In fact, but for dog shows and the institutionalized fancy, this breed would not exist at all. (The study that found the bull terrier to be so inbred can be found here , and another analysis can be found at terrierman, where the breed of choice is the Jack Russell, the least inbred dog.)
I know this breed best from the Alby Mangels “World Safari” series, in which several of these dogs and crosses of them, accompanied the Dutch-born Australian filmmaker across the world. Some of you may know them from the “Spuds MacKenzie” dog that was used to advertise beer. I once wanted one of these dogs badly, but now that I’ve found out about how inbred they are, I’m really not so keen on them.
Why is this breed so inbred? The answer lies in its history.
In the early to mid-nineteenth century, old- type bull dogs were losing their gameness, and bull and bear baiting was made illegal after the passage of the Cruelty of Animals Act in 1835. Dog-fighting and ratting continued on as the main bloodsports. (By ratting, I mean rat-killing contests in which dogs were judged by how many rats they could dispatch in a timed killing event).
Ratting terriers were developed, often with adding either Italian greyhound or whippet blood. Two standardized dogs developed from these ratting dogs, the Manchester (the black and tan– not be confused with the black and tan fell terrier) and the English white terrier (not to be confused with the white terrier used to bolt foxes during hunts). These dogs soon became refined and standardized as pets, and toy versions were bred for fashionable pets. The English white terrier that is ancestral to the bull terrier is a refined dog from the 1860’s, not mean to be a working ratter at all.
These ratting terriers were crossed with bulldogs to make the bull-and-terrier, which became the preferred breed of he fighting ring. These dogs are the ancestors of the pit bull and Staffordshire bull terrier breeds.

"Dustman," depicted here in 1812, was a celebrated fighting bull-and-terrier.
In the 1860’s, a dog dealer, who sold dogs to people wanting “valuable” purebred dogs for pets, named James Hinks began crossing the pet white terrier with a white bulldog. These dogs were called “bull terriers,” and they were an instant hit with the people. These dogs had the refined lines of the pet English white terrier with the muscles of bulldog. It was meant to be a gentleman’s dog, a dog that wouldn’t start a fight but would finish one if attacked. (This is, of course, nonsense.) The white dogs were called “white cavaliers” because of this reputation.
Dalmatian blood was added to further refine this breed. Some lines were crossed with the toy version of the pet white terrier to make smaller dogs, even toy versions of the breed. Many of these dogs had apple heads, just like the toy white terriers. The bigger ones and the smaller ones were kept in their own distinctive lines, but the toy bull terrier died out by World War I.
These dogs were the ultimate fad dogs, and mass-production of so many similar dogs certainly required a great deal of inbreeding. Little did most breeders realize it, but breeding for the white color locked in a related gene for deafness. Splitting the dogs into different sizes further Balkanized the gene pool, as did the breeding for the white color exclusively.
By 1890’s, the English white terrier fell out of favor as the amount of deafness found in the breed. It was worthless as a terrier, and this breed died out. This deafness characteristic would later become a major issue in the bull terrier.
Whippet and perhaps other sight hounds were also crossed into the Bull terrier, creating the egg-shaped head that so much a trademark of the breed. However, the breeders did a great deal of inbreeding to fix that head type. The eyes were also bred triangular as part of the head piece.
Then in 1895, cropping was banned in Britain. Before then, ears of virtually all terriers were cropped. This ban could have proved the death knell for the bull terrier. However, its breeders soon began breeding dogs with erect ears. Breeding erect ears also meant that a certain amount of inbreeding had to happen, because erect ears are a recessive trait. It happens to be one of the harder recessive traits to select for, and as a result, the bull terrier lost popularity. Fewer dogs meant that genetic diversity would be a bit truncated, and this narrowing of the gene pool was fed back with the selective breeding for the erect ear.

"Patsy Ann" was a bull terrier that greeted ships at Juneau, Alaska in the 1930's. She had the egg-shaped head of the breed, but her ear carriage was typical of early bull terriers.
In 1917, the first modern bull terrier was born, “Lord Gladiator.” He added another fad characteristic to the breed. He had no stop. Soon, all bull terriers were bred without stops, very often using dogs related to Gladiator or Gladiator himself. This would be an example of the most-used sire effect.
At some point after this, it was decided as caprice of the fancy to breed for a downward pointing muzzle (“downface.”) Today’s bull terrier standard doesn’t require it, but it is so common that large numbers of them still have it. The standard does allow for a “downface.” The changes in the breed’s skull that came from breeding this feature are commonly pointed out. It is a rather drastic shift in the bull terrier’s conformation.
Changes in the bull terrier skull:

By the 1930’s, breeders began to see that breeding for the white color was creating many deaf dogs. The white color was associated with deafness, so it was then decided to add color to the lines to reduce the chances of deafness. The mandarins in the breed were not necessarily happy with this decision, but they eventually compromised. They would allow the colored dogs to exist within the breed, but only as a separate variety. A separate variety, as we have seen in the golden retriever, can easily be culled off and made another breed. Thus, the bull terrier’s lineage became even more Balkanized. The colored bull terriers were the result of adding Staffordshire bull terrier to the bloodline, which did decrease inbreeding. But the staffie’s eyes were inherited in the offspring. To make these colored dogs become more of a bull terrier type, they had to inbreed again. It took several decades to create colored bull terriers that could be shown at the same level as the white ones.
As I said earlier, bull terriers originally came in a wide range of sizes, mainly because this was one of the few breeds that did not have a size requirement in its standard. The current AKC standard lacks a size requirement. However, the larger sizes tended to do better in the ring than the smaller ones. So the breeders of the smaller size formed their own breed, the Miniature Bull terrier. This breed was recognized as a separate breed by the AKC in 1992.
This continuous punctuated fad breeding and the continuous aggregation of different traits into different strains of this dog created a narrow gene pool in th breed. It has had a far longer time period of continuous ”fancy breeding” than virtually any other breed in existence. That is why it is so inbred.
Now, I’m sure I’ll get a response like this: “We can’t breed bull terriers for their original purpose, so why should we care about the original type?” Well, the original purpose of the bull terrier is to be a pet and a plaything of the upper middle class and the wealthy. It was not designed primarily to be a fighting breed, although some individuals did partake in fights. The primary purpose of this breed was to be a pet, marketed to gentlemen and men who thought themselves gentlemen.
Update: If you think I’m making this stuff up, please pull your head out of your anus.
It’s kind of amazing that they can be more inbred than some of the breeds like otterhounds that tend to show about 5 dogs per year registered with AKC.
The otthound is really interesting. It is actually a “griffon,” a wire-haired hound. There’s a very similar breed called Griffon Nivernais, http://www.thebreedsofdogs.com/GRIFFON_NIVERNAIS.htm. It isn’t as big as the otterhound, but it is believed that the otterhound resulted from crossing French griffon hounds (and there are many) with bloodhounds and foxhounds.
These dogs were murder on the European otter in Britain, so much so that the otter nearly disappeared. When otters were protected, the otterhound packs were out of work. A few were used to hunt American mink, which were an invasive species that replaced the European mink (which isn’t a “true mink,” it’s actually a polecat or ferret.) Then they banned pack hunting, even for American mink. And the breed has no real purpose anymore.
It’s the ancestor of the Airedale, and that’s what it will be known as.
The otterhound has been standardized as a show dog. This happened early on.
However, it has never been popular as a pet, because it’s a pack hound. There’s only a handful of pack hounds that have ever made it as family pets (most are Bassets). Pack hound are hard to train. They bay all the time. They have lots of energy and endurance. And they do have an odor. And otterhounds, well, have a strong odor because they are a kind of water dog. Further, their coats are hard to care for. So you wonder why only 5 are shown every year.
This breed as a working dog was always maintained through outcrosses with griffons, bloodhounds, and foxhounds, and now it’s a very endangered dog.
What a very interesting and sad history for this extremely cool breed. Well done retrieverman! I’ve always loved the clown-like behavior that many members this tough and muscular breed can have, at times almost living up to the “nonsense” of being a fighting breed that doesn’t seem all that serious (towards humans that is… I’m aware that they can feel like whipping another dog’s ass). I’ve met many BT’s at shows and the vets I worked for, and every one of them was hilarious or charming.
Your descriptions of the “fad breeding” has vindicated my years of complaining to friends about the stupid “downfaced” look, since they ignored my observations because I am not a judge or breeder. I thought I was the only one that noticed the changes in the dogs and old pictures of the breed over the years. The early look is so cool; a chiseled, full, wedge-like head. NOT a dripping moose-face.
I hope those that make meaningless changes in the breed (like the down-turned face) try that argument you predicted, because you could easily say there is no reason for the change whether it was a fighting breed or not… And why bother having ANY breed if people are constantly going to f— with the original look out of pure bratty “because I want to” disrespect. They didn’t invent the breed… but they have to change it? Come up with your own completely different breeds! Finally… the change doesn’t look better! Do they want it to look like a person? There are enough people around to look at. If the changed look came as a surprise or non-deliberately, I understand and do not mean to offend anyone.
I had a golden retriever-Irish setter 50/50 mix. He was from an “accidental” litter, and given to my family for free. GREAT dog; could have been a good field or duck hunting dog (according to bird-hunting family and friends). The look was a retriever build with setter coloring. Yet i still didn’t go and try to pass it off as the new way either breed should look… trying to make retrievers darker or setters heavier w/ golden highlights. I simply enjoyed that companion for 14 years.
Goldens always have varied in appearance. I’ve had purebred goldens that people mistake for setter crosses. They used to be quite common and were the preferred type when the breed was split off from the flat-coated retriever (which happened in 1912). They were the main type that was first imported to this country from Canada, which had always had a population of them, because one of their Governor-Generals was married to the golden retriever’s founder’s daughter. These were of the dark and more moderately built type.
And the reason why they look like setters is there were at least two red Irish setters that were crossed into the golden’s line. Plus, as a strain of flat-coat, there were already lots of Irish setters crossed into that breed.
Now, as for bull terriers. I wanted one badly.
I wanted a solid white one.
Then I got a book on them, which was excellent. It had their full history. They aren’t derived from exactly the same stock as Staffies, AmStaffs, and Pit bulls, although all of them evolved from crossing bulldogs and terriers of various types. The bull terrier was created by James Hinks who crossed a white terrier (a ratting dog more like a whippet than a terrier) with a white bulldog. The breed was not meant to be a fighting dog, although it was often used as such. It was meant to be gentlemen’s pet that would fight when provoked. However, there were fighting bull terriers of this strain; it just wasn’t whatt Hinks wanted them to be.
But they have changed dramatically over the years, almost as much as the bulldog has.
I think you will find that the US is the only country that separates white English Bull Terriers (to use it`s correct name) and coloured. This as with everything else in America is about money. Also unless it is a top quality UK import then the examples in the US and even the Champions seen in US text books and at shows are very inferior to even a good quality pet in the UK.
Bull terriers are pretty effed up regardless of what country they are in. This is the most inbred dog registered with the KC, and I assume that if we looked at its global inbreeding data, it would be the same result. In the US, the Bull Terrier Club threw a fit, when it was suggested that dogs with color be added to their stud books. That’s why the colored variety is a separate variety in our terrier group. They can be interbred, but if you wind up with a dog with what’s called “Irish spotting” (which is in between white and colored), it’s not easy to fit. As a result, I’d say that our lines of bull terrier are even more inbred than those in other countries.
To call them English bull terriers is a bit of a redundancy. It’s like calling them Scottish golden retrievers or German dachshunds. I just checked the FCI’s listing for the breed, and it’s “Bull Terrier (Standard).”
I’ve seen British show dogs that were quite messed up, particularly in my breed where the European show-type has all the retrieving ability and intelligence of the average sheep and all the speed and agility of an Old English sheepdog.
Bull terriers were meant to be pet dogs. They were not pit fighters, like staffies and their American counterparts. Because they were meant to be fashionable pets, they had a great many fads and crazes running through their history. A really interesting thing to look at how dramatically that breed has changed. James Hinks never would have seen a dog with an egg shaped head or naturally erect ears. He also would’ve been shocked that there were brindles, fawns, and other colors in the breed.
Of course, we Americans did try our hand at making our own varieties of “bull and terrier,” like the American Staffordshire terrier and the Pit Bull. Believe it or not, the Boston terrier was once called the Boston bull terrier, even though it’s much more of a toy bulldog than any kind of bull and terrier.
But the James Hinks bull terrier is really a good case study in what happens to purebred dogs, especially those that were mass marketed as pets early on in the fancy.
You may say that it’s all about money over here, and it is. But we are far from the only country like that, and this mass production of purebred dogs is a British invention, as is the conformation show.
a think the pit bulls shuld not be baned becose its not the dog the owners two blamethe are lyck a chiled if you bring them up right thay trn out right
Banning pit bulls is stupid, counterproductive, and bigoted.
I’ve met too many super nice pit bulls to think that banning them would be anyway to prevent severe dog bites.